站内导读
中文 这份 CLAUDE.md 规则文件依据 Andrej Karpathy 对 LLM 编码常见问题的观察整理,用于约束 Claude Code 的行为。它针对模型擅自假设、过度设计、改动无关代码等问题,给出四条原则:先思考再写码、简洁优先、外科式改动、目标驱动执行。可通过插件或项目级 CLAUDE.md 安装,适合用 Claude Code 或 Cursor 的开发者。
日本語 Andrej Karpathy が指摘した LLM のコーディング上の問題を踏まえ、Claude Code の挙動を整える単一の CLAUDE.md ルール集。勝手な仮定や過剰設計、無関係なコード変更を抑えるため、コーディング前の思考、簡潔さ優先、外科的変更、目標駆動の実行という四原則を示す。プラグインかプロジェクト単位の CLAUDE.md で導入でき、Claude Code や Cursor を使う開発者向け。
한국어 Andrej Karpathy가 지적한 LLM 코딩 문제를 바탕으로 Claude Code의 동작을 개선하는 단일 CLAUDE.md 규칙 파일이다. 모델이 임의로 가정하거나 과도하게 설계하고 무관한 코드를 건드리는 문제를 다루며, 코딩 전 사고, 단순성 우선, 외과적 변경, 목표 기반 실행의 네 원칙을 제시한다. 플러그인이나 프로젝트별 CLAUDE.md로 설치하며 Claude Code와 Cursor 사용자에게 적합하다.
English A single CLAUDE.md rule file that shapes Claude Code behavior, based on Andrej Karpathy's observations of common LLM coding failures. It targets silent assumptions, overengineered abstractions, and edits to unrelated code through four principles: think before coding, simplicity first, surgical changes, and goal-driven execution. Install it as a plugin or per-project CLAUDE.md; it suits developers using Claude Code or Cursor.
README · 详细文档
来源 · 查看原文
Karpathy-Inspired Claude Code Guidelines
Check out my new project Multica — an open-source platform for running and managing coding agents with reusable skills. Follow me on X: https://x.com/jiayuan_jy
A single CLAUDE.md file to improve Claude Code behavior, derived from Andrej Karpathy's observations on LLM coding pitfalls.
English | 简体中文
The Problems
From Andrej's post:
"The models make wrong assumptions on your behalf and just run along with them without checking. They don't manage their confusion, don't seek clarifications, don't surface inconsistencies, don't present tradeoffs, don't push back when they should."
"They really like to overcomplicate code and APIs, bloat abstractions, don't clean up dead code... implement a bloated construction over 1000 lines when 100 would do."
"They still sometimes change/remove comments and code they don't sufficiently understand as side effects, even if orthogonal to the task."
The Solution
Four principles in one file that directly address these issues:
| Principle | Addresses | |-----------|-----------| | Think Before Coding | Wrong assumptions, hidden confusion, missing tradeoffs | | Simplicity First | Overcomplication, bloated abstractions | | Surgical Changes | Orthogonal edits, touching code you shouldn't | | Goal-Driven Execution | Leverage through tests-first, verifiable success criteria |
The Four Principles in Detail
1. Think Before Coding
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
LLMs often pick an interpretation silently and run with it. This principle forces explicit reasoning:
- State assumptions explicitly — If uncertain, ask rather than guess
- Present multiple interpretations — Don't pick silently when ambiguity exists
- Push back when warranted — If a simpler approach exists, say so
- Stop when confused — Name what's unclear and ask for clarification
2. Simplicity First
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
Combat the tendency toward overengineering:
- No features beyond what was asked
- No abstractions for single-use code
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested
- No error handling for impossible scenarios
- If 200 lines could be 50, rewrite it
The test: Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated? If yes, simplify.
3. Surgical Changes
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
When editing existing code:
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it — don't delete it
When your changes create orphans:
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
4. Goal-Driven Execution
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
Transform imperative tasks into verifiable goals:
| Instead of... | Transform to... | |--------------|-----------------| | "Add validation" | "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass" | | "Fix the bug" | "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass" | | "Refactor X" | "Ensure tests pass before and after" |
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]
Strong success criteria let the LLM loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.
Install
Option A: Claude Code Plugin (recommended)
From within Claude Code, first add the marketplace:
/plugin marketplace add forrestchang/andrej-karpathy-skills
Then install the plugin:
/plugin install andrej-karpathy-skills@karpathy-skills
This installs the guidelines as a Claude Code plugin, making the skill available across all your projects.
Option B: CLAUDE.md (per-project)
New project:
curl -o CLAUDE.md https://raw.githubusercontent.com/forrestchang/andrej-karpathy-skills/main/CLAUDE.md
Existing project (append):
echo "" >> CLAUDE.md
curl https://raw.githubusercontent.com/forrestchang/andrej-karpathy-skills/main/CLAUDE.md >> CLAUDE.md
Using with Cursor
This repository includes a committed Cursor project rule (.cursor/rules/karpathy-guidelines.mdc) so the same guidelines apply when you open the project in Cursor. See CURSOR.md for setup, using the rule in other projects, and how this relates to Claude Code.
Key Insight
From Andrej:
"LLMs are exceptionally good at looping until they meet specific goals... Don't tell it what to do, give it success criteria and watch it go."
The "Goal-Driven Execution" principle captures this: transform imperative instructions into declarative goals with verification loops.
How to Know It's Working
These guidelines are working if you see:
- Fewer unnecessary changes in diffs — Only requested changes appear
- Fewer rewrites due to overcomplication — Code is simple the first time
- Clarifying questions come before implementation — Not after mistakes
- Clean, minimal PRs — No drive-by refactoring or "improvements"
Customization
These guidelines are designed to be merged with project-specific instructions. Add them to your existing CLAUDE.md or create a new one.
For project-specific rules, add sections like:
## Project-Specific Guidelines
- Use TypeScript strict mode
- All API endpoints must have tests
- Follow the existing error handling patterns in `src/utils/errors.ts`
Tradeoff Note
These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks (simple typo fixes, obvious one-liners), use judgment — not every change needs the full rigor.
The goal is reducing costly mistakes on non-trivial work, not slowing down simple tasks.
License
MIT